In Shi (2015), the author explores how syntactic structure influences the interpretation of scope in natural language. The study is situated within the field of generative grammar and seeks to explain how hierarchical syntactic representations can account for differences in scope readings, particularly in sentences with quantifiers and negation. The motivation arises from cross-linguistic evidence showing that word order alone does not fully predict scope interpretations.
Shi adopts a minimalist approach to syntax, building on Chomskyβs framework. The paper assumes that scope relations are derived from structural configurations, specifically c-command relationships. The author challenges surface-based scope theories by providing empirical data supporting the notion that syntactic movement and hierarchical positions, rather than linear order, determine scope interactions.
Through data drawn from multiple languages, including Mandarin Chinese and English, the paper demonstrates how variations in scope readings can be systematically predicted based on underlying syntactic positions. Shi uses contrasts between wide and narrow scope readings of quantificational expressions and employs syntactic tests to support the claim that scope is syntactically encoded rather than pragmatically inferred.
Shi (2015) concludes that a syntax-driven account of scope offers a more explanatory and predictive model than alternative approaches. The findings contribute to the broader understanding of the interface between syntax and semantics, with implications for language acquisition and cross-linguistic variation. The paper calls for further research into how syntactic structures universally constrain semantic interpretations.